TOPIC: Kepler

Re: Kepler 14 years 2 months ago #1161

  • [LAW]Avalanche
  • [LAW]Avalanche's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 51
  • Thank you received: 4
  • Karma: 1
[LAW]kmartburrito wrote:
[LAW]DirtyDog wrote:
[LAW]kmartburrito wrote:
I saw the benches for the 6xx series that got released last week, I'm assuming that's what's linked on the first page, it was somewhat underwhelming IMO, regardless of whether it's their midrange chip or not. .

So 12fps over the 7970 and almost 18fps over the 580GTX in BF3 @ 1920x1080 with 8xMSAA, as a single card single chip solution, is underwhelming? Well then, I'm really gonna be underwhelmed :lol: with 2 of them playing BF3 @ 2560x1600 on ultra high.

The funny thing about all of this is that it's a moot point if the card is generating anything over 60fps if you're using a 60hz monitor. If you're running a 7970 at 60fps on ultra settings, and you've spent a fuck ton of money getting the 680 to get 18fps more, then you're wasting your money because your monitor won't display those frames.

If you have a 120hz monitor though, it's a different story. If it gets you from 90fps to 120fps, then you're golden, and it would be worth it. You really have to weigh these options though, otherwise it's a boost for games that will stress your system that haven't even come out yet. And this shit moves SO fast, it's tough on our pocketbooks.

I just mean underwhelming because it's more of the same. I'd like to see a next iteration of tech be like a 50fps boost. Something that will make me salivate at the thought of changing out both of my crossfired cards that aren't that old.

Resolution is also a huge contributing factor though. Think of the folks who having 2560x1600 resolutions, or those running in Eyefinity/nVSurround. A more powerful card that can push more pixels in a bench can make a difference at larger resolutions.


Main: Intel i7 2600K @ 4.7 GHz :: Gigabyte GA-Z68X-UD3H-B3 :: Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600MHz (4x4GB) :: Samsung 830 Series 256GB SSD :: Seagate ST31500341AS 1.5TB HDD :: 2x WD WD20EADS 2TB HDD :: EVGA GTX 580 SLI :: Corsair AX1200 PSU :: Corsair 650D

Folding: Intel i7 920 @ 3.2 GHz :: EVGA X58 SLI LE :: OCZ Platinum Edition DDR3 1600MHz (3x2GB) :: Intel G2 80GB SSD :: Gigabyte GTX 560 Ti OC SLI :: Corsair TX850M PSU :: Cooler Master Hyper 212 Plus :: Cooler Master CM690 Original
The administrator has disabled public write access.

Re: Kepler 14 years 2 months ago #1162

  • [LAW]DirtyDog
  • [LAW]DirtyDog's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 182
  • Thank you received: 6
  • Karma: 3
Resolution is also a huge contributing factor though. Think of the folks who having 2560x1600 resolutions, or those running in Eyefinity/nVSurround. A more powerful card that can push more pixels in a bench can make a difference at larger resolutions.

Exactly.. It'll be nice to finally be able to play a game with nice graphics @ my monitors native resolution, with everything set to the max.
CM Storm Trooper | Asus Rampage IV Formula | Intel Core i7 3930K @ 4.6Ghz | Corsair Dominator GT 16GB 2133 | Corsair H100 Liquid CPU cooler | Corsair Force Series GT 120GB SSD x 3 (2 in RAID 0) | WD Caviar Black 2 TB HD | SeaSonic X-SERIES X-1050 | 2 x EVGA 680 GTX SLI | Dell UltraSharp 3007WFP | Klipsch Promedia 2.1 | MERC Gaming Keyboard | Logitech G5 mouse | CH: Combat Stick, Pro Throttle and Pro Pedals
The administrator has disabled public write access.
copyright © LowAltitudewarfare 2015

Login or Register

LOG IN